This is a book from my library that I have had a long time and actually could not recall ever reading although I am sure I did at the time of purchase.
A model army using woodscrews as soldiers based on an article in Miniature Warfare magazine in 1969
Monday, 30 August 2021
BOOK REVIEW: THE EASTERN FRONT 1914-1917
This is a book from my library that I have had a long time and actually could not recall ever reading although I am sure I did at the time of purchase.
Thursday, 26 August 2021
BOOK REVIEW: UNTIL THE EYES SHUT.
Sunday, 22 August 2021
UPDATE.
August in the UK this year has clearly been the first month of Autumn with some weeks of rain, cloud and low temperatures. The good side of this is that I have managed to get a bit more modelling time. Since my last update I have completed upgrades 27 through 32 which have added 714 more soldiers to the ranks.
On the woodworking project I am still waiting for the quarter inch thick white melamine faced MDF sheets that I use for the back of the display unit and the actual shelves. In common with many building and timber products these sheets are in short supply at the moment and have more or less doubled in price too. I am told delivery should be next week so will keep my fingers crossed. As soon as work starts on construction of the new unit I will post accordingly.
Regular readers will have noticed a new Imagi-Nations post this past week. As I mentioned previously the timeline is now within a couple of years of the present day so I decided to spread out the remaining chapters and publish just once a month. I hope you all still find them interesting.
I have been surprised that no one commented on the video I included in my last update on the battle of Isandlwana. Maybe everyone has already seen the film and I was late to the party. However if you have not watched it, I urge you to do so, it really is very good.
Wednesday, 18 August 2021
IMAGI-NATIONS. PART 43.
THE BATTLES WITH RUSSIA.
While fighting raged in the west against Germany in late 1888 and early 1889 the two sides in Ukraine remained facing each other with neither side having the strength to force a decision. The Russians had committed virtually their whole army to the struggle but still could not risk an assault against the over whelming UNION artillery. The UNION had only four armies in Ukraine and until reinforcements became available after the defeat of Germany they too did not wish to risk an attack. Both sides contented themselves with digging in and exchanging regular artillery barrages although the Russians had soon learned that UNION counter battery fire was highly effective meaning Russian batteries had to move positions regularly.
When the Germans had initially invaded in the west, the UNION was very concerned that the Russians would launch an attack to support their allies knowing that UNION forces would be weakened in Ukraine as a result of fighting on two fronts. They had therefore adopted a strategy of launching cavalry raids from the south of Ukraine against the 1000 mile long Russian supply lines in the north. The four cavalry brigades available were formed into an ad hoc cavalry army under the command of General Forrest and he established a base just north of Kiev. The government of Ukraine supported the UNION cavalry by supplying food and fodder to the base meaning that UNION transport companies only had to deliver ammunition and other military supplies. In addition the UNION finally decided to construct a railway line from Richmond to Kiev, something the Ukrainians had been requesting for years but which the UNION had refused because of the conditions agreed with Russia in the peace treaty after the War of Independence which precluded either side from constructing any railways in Ukraine.
The cavalry under Forrest launched their first raid against Russian supply lines and their railway on 7 December 1888. It was a great success and resulted in destruction of several Russian trains and substantial damage to the tracks in many places as well as destruction of large amounts of supplies. Over the next few months the raids continued as the Russians desperately sought to defend their supply lines. A large number of Russian reserves as well as troops from the front line formations were deployed to protect the railway reaching over 50,000 men by January 1889. Blockhouses were constructed at intervals along the railway but UNION cavalry seemed able to slip between the Russian positions almost at will. By late February severe shortages of ammunition and other supplies were being felt throughout the Russian front line formations.
The Russians realised that their situation was becoming desperate and with news of the collapse of the German army it was only a matter of time before huge UNION reinforcements would arrive to launch an over whelming attack on the weakened Russian army. Clearly the Russian gamble had now failed and it was time for the Russians to retreat out of Ukraine and seek to defend the border where at least they would be free of the very damaging UNION cavalry attacks. Preparations immediately began to start a phased withdrawal using strong rearguards to prevent the UNION turning the retreat into a rout.
At the end of March 1889 the Russians began their retreat. The UNION had no idea at first the Russians were falling back as strong Russian rearguards gave the impression the Russian forces were still in position. A UNION cavalry attack on the Russian railway on 2nd April gave the first serious indication of the Russian retreat. As UNION cavalry ambushed a Russian train moving east the cavalry were surprised to receive very fierce return fire from the train. As it came to a halt, over 2,000 Russian troops deployed from the train and assaulted the dismounted cavalry. Almost immediately another train arrived and also disgorged a large number of troops who joined the attack on the UNION cavalry. Vastly outnumbered and suffering heavy casualties, the UNION cavalry had to make a quick retreat.
The same thing happened two days later as the UNION command realised that railway traffic on the Russian tracks was now predominately east bound. A Russian retreat was clearly in progress. UNION forces were instructed to follow up the Russian withdrawal but, to avoid unnecessary casualties , to maintain a distance unless Russian troops showed an inclination to hold their ground for more than a day or two. The UNION cavalry were ordered to cease attacks on the Russian railways, except for horse artillery fire on passing trains, and just monitor the Russian withdrawal.
By early June 1889 the Russians had withdrawn to the Volga river and could be seen by UNION cavalry patrols to be entrenching on the eastern bank on Russian soil. The UNION army advance guard arrived on the west bank on 15th June and deployed opposite the main bridge. UNION heavy artillery was ordered to destroy the bridge with a bombardment at dawn on 17th but during the evening of 16th June the bridge exploded and collapsed from the effects of Russian demolition charges. During the following days a number of Russian stragglers were captured along the line of the railway as they made their way east. All were escorted to the Volga and, after a short delay, a boat came over from the Russian side and was allowed to remove the last Russian troops from Ukraine. Further south, the other two light bridges over the Volga were destroyed by Russian demolition charges as soon as UNION forces came in sight.
As the UNION celebrated its victory over the combined forces of Germany and Russia, time was also taken to remember the many thousands of UNION soldiers who had been lost in the heavy fighting on both fronts. The war had cost more UNION lives than any other war and the UNION was very aware that defeat had come very close. The exhausted UNION armies remained in their front line positions while preparations were made for them to return to their bases and arrangements were made for small garrisons to monitor both the Volga and the Rhine. Without warning on 28th June a message was flashed to all UNION commands that cavalry from 10th Reserve army patrolling in southern China had located a very large Chinese army moving south towards the border.
Friday, 13 August 2021
BOOK REVIEW: FROM THE GRACCHI TO NERO.
Following my review a while ago of my old school book about Republican Rome, Ion of the Archduke Piccolo blog told me about this book, by the same author, which is the follow up volume. Of course I just had to buy a copy and secured this used "as new" paperback. Thanks Ion for bringing this book to my attention.
I have now read the book and it is excellent. I really like the writing style and it complements the previous volume perfectly. The transformation of Republican Rome to Imperial Rome is clearly described. It is strange that, at the time, the Emperor was not so, just First Citizen. Romans had a great historical aversion to the idea of a Monarchy so the move towards an Emperor was carefully disguised using the old Republican terms of Consul etc. It is also clear that most Romans had no desire to repeat the misery of the Civil Wars so were happy to accept the peace and prosperity bought by an all powerful "First Citizen" who curbed the ability of individual Senators to enrich and empower themselves at the expense of the nation.
I have looked for the logical next volume covering the Emperors after Nero but can find nothing written by Scullard which is a great shame. However as I am more interested in the early history of Rome I will not worry too much about finding an alternative author.
On a general note, in reading about Rome, it never ceases to amaze me just how sophisticated Roman society actually was some 2000 years ago. I often wonder, if Roman civilization had not given way to the Dark Ages but had continued to advance without interruption, just where would we be today. It is at least arguable that a good 500 years of development were lost to Mankind. On that basis the civilization of today could have existed in 1521. Now that is a thought !!!!